Flaws: Subjective/Objective Problem

Some flawed LSAT arguments infer a person’s intent from his or her actions (or vice versa).¬† If I were to accidentally¬†knock a child down, I would not necessarily be guilty of child abuse.

This “subjective/objective” problem shows up periodically on the LSAT, but it is not otherwise common enough to be listed as a major fallacy. It only appears twice in 10 Actual Official LSAT Preptests, Volume VI (once as a correct answer and once as a wrong answer).

  • 72-2-5: Firepower movie (Vol VI, p. 16). 83% identified this as the correct answer to this “medium difficulty” question.
  • 74-4-18: Melatonin (Vol VI, p. 116). 7% chose this wrong answer to this “hardest difficulty” question.

2 thoughts on “Flaws: Subjective/Objective Problem”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.